Regeneration Report: Game 01
Trygon
Harpy
840 pt game with one less turn. Five turns
Harpy took four wounds. Regenerated twice.
Trygon took one wound. No Regeneration.
Rolled a total of seven times.
Analysis: break even.
Argument for Regeneration
Most of the large creatures in the Tyranid codex have the option for Regeneration. This means that if it has lost a wound, you roll a d6 for each lost wound at the beginning of your turn. Any result of a “6” regains a wound.
The cost for this power is critical. It is in the 15-30 point range. It costs between 9% and 20% of the cost of the creature. The reason for this percentage is critical is that one in six odds of regenerating even a single wound will (ie 16% chance) will at least get your points back, even if on average you get only one shot per game.
Obviously, it is a more valuable power, the lower the percent cost. So, if you add a lot of biomorphs and upgrades then Regeneration becomes an attractive option; a little bit of insurance for your investment.
Renn and I have a bit of a dispute here. I think Regeneration is awesome. Here’s why.
For Regeneration to be useful, you have to have taken a wound. So, the only scenario where it isn’t useful is if you get entirely killed in one single turn. It isn’t useful when you are at full Wounds, but then again, you’re doing good if you take no wounds.
So, the question is: how many wounds on average will you regain from this power. If Regeneration nets you even one wound back, then it will have paid for itself. This is because a creature’s hitting power is not reduced with a reduction in Wounds.
This also has a side-effect of forcing your opponent to concentrate firepower on a single creature. If all your monsters have Regeneration and he spreads out his firepower, then it’s going to become a nightmare of Regeneration rolls at the beginning of each of your turns.
Insta-kill plays in as well. If a monstrous creature has T5 (only two of this type can have Regeneration: the Tyranid Prime and the Harpy) it can be insta-killed by S10 weapons, so you have to watch out for that. It’s a limited list so you might not want to take Regeneration for T5 creatures when playing against lists that are likely to have those types of weapons.
What weapons will likely be assailing your monstrous regenerators?
Meltaguns (now within 12″, chomp!)
Lascannons
Missile Launchers (krak)
Plasma Guns (only wound on a 3+)
Railguns (ouch! But not likely to be massed enough to take out all six wounds)
Let’s examine, then. I predict that a monstrous regenerator is going to roll 5-10 times during the average game. This will net an average of one or two wounds back. I’m going to track this during my first games.
The other interesting thing is that it becomes more powerful the worse off the Regenerator is. A Regenerator with one lousy wound left gets to roll five dice!
The depressing thing is that for those large creatures, the Regeneration roll will net back a wound caused by a heavy weapon. That lascannon shot? Just got it back!
I predict that this will be one of the premium powers from the new codex. Wait and see.
Where in the constitution does it say Only Gold and Silver shall be Legal tender
Submitted by ****** on Fri, 03/14/2008 – 02:35
i looked through the constitution, and the only thing i could find was
“No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.”
this doesn’t prohibit the printing of unbacked paper money does it?
Ron Paul keeps referencing that the federal reserve is unconstitutional for this reason.. can anybody tell me where it says that the federal government cannot print unbacked paper money in the constitution?
thanks..
You’ve come to the best place to ask about this and we are more than happy to help.
Your questions alone show that you do not completely understand the Constitution. But, do not take that comment in a bad way – many of us have only learned these things recently or in the past few years as well.
“this doesn’t prohibit the printing of unbacked paper money does it?”
and
“can anybody tell me where it says that the federal government cannot print unbacked paper money in the constitution?”
Notice that I put the words in your quotes, “cannot” and “prohibit”, in bold. These are the key points in regards to your misunderstanding of the Constitution.
The Constitution is NOT a list of what the federal government cannot do. It is NOT a list of prohibitions on the federal government.
The Constitution IS a list of what the federal government is authorized to do, with ALL ELSE being DENIED to it by default. The absense of specific constitutional authorization for anything means that the federal government is denied/prohibited by default.
Amendments 9 & 10 are probably the clearest and most simple explanation of that point:
AMENDMENT IX
RIGHTS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.AMENDMENT X
POWERS RETAINED BY THE STATES AND THE PEOPLE
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
About the money issue, take the following from the Constitution:
Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: The Congress shall have Power…To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.
So, from that we have:
1. The federal government can coin money.
2. States cannot coin money.
3. States have the authority of determining what can be used as a tender in payment of debts by default, because the federal government does not have that specific constitutional authorization.
4. States are then prohibited by the Constitution from making any Thing but gold or silver coin a tender in payment of debts. (Which also additionally proves that #3 is correct.)
Regarding your other question about the Federal Reserve… in order for the Federal Reserve to be legal, as per the highest law of our land, it MUST be specifically authorized by the Constitution. It is not, therefore it is forbidden by default.
By the way, in case you weren’t aware – the Federal Reserve is our nation’s THIRD incarnation of a central bank.
Downsize DC Dispatch
You just won a big victory in the Supreme Court, but the media would have you believe otherwise. This message will explain . . .
* What you just won in the Citizens United case
* How and why the media is lying to you about it
* And what remains to be done to restore more of your Constitutional rights
Here’s the basic situation . . .
Governments spend nearly half of the money you earn. This means that politicians have more influence over your life than anyone else. But how much influence do you have over the politicians?
You have the power to fire any employee or company that doesn’t provide you with a good product or service at a price you’re willing to pay. But you have almost no power to fire and replace your most important employees — members of Congress.
Why is that?
The answer is disturbing. Incumbent politicians have erected campaign finance restrictions designed to protect themselves, silence taxpayers, and cripple challengers. The politicians and the media tell us these laws are needed to prevent corruption, but does government seem less corrupt to you? Here’s the truth . . .
If you’re an incumbent, and it’s virtually illegal for people to raise enough money to unseat you, then you’re free to do whatever you want. THIS is a recipe for corruption. THIS, and NOT campaign contributions, is one of the main reasons WHY we have such a Big, Wasteful, Corrupt government.
Many things must be done to achieve honest, Constitutional government, but among the most important is the need to restore your . . .
* Freedom of speech
* Freedom of the press
* And freedom of association
Doing this will allow you to associate with others to raise and spend the money required to FIRE incumbent politicians. At present, the campaign finance laws prohibit you from doing this. Ask yourself this question . . .
Can you afford, all by yourself, to run for office to unseat an incumbent officeholder?
The answer is clearly no. This means that you must exercise your freedom of association to join with others to raise the required funds. But first you will have to spend large sums of money to persuade people to participate. This is like starting a business, and that requires capital!
Too bad. This kind of capital has to be raised in chunks of ten and a hundred thousand dollars, but the campaign finance laws limit you to contributions of $2,100. That’s why its mostly the rich and well-connected who win election to public office. Meanwhile . . .
The established corporate news media can do something you cannot. They can raise and spend unlimited amounts to communicate about politicians, campaigns, and issues. The media constantly tells you what your choices are, and they never include, for instance, people like Ron Paul.
Media businesses have an unrestricted freedom of the press, but you do not. This helps to explain why so many in the news media . . .
* Love the campaign finance restrictions
* Tell so many lies about how these laws really work
* Constantly promote the need for more such laws
* Shriek whenever you gain rights similar to what they enjoy
It’s important to understand that the campaign finance restrictions not ONLY protect incumbents, but they ALSO give the established corporate news media privileged influence over public opinion. Fortunately . . .
DC Downsizers have worked for years to change this, and that work is starting to have an impact.
Most cases against the campaign finance laws have focused on the freedom of speech, but these challenges have always been denied by the courts, under the perverse reasoning that “money isn’t speech.” This is why . . .
Our attorneys were the first to argue that, even if money isn’t speech, money IS required to run a press or broadcasting effort. Our 2003 case, Ron Paul v. FEC, argued that the freedom of the press is a right that must be protected for all Americans, not only for those who run media businesses.
Our claim was denied, but the influence of our reasoning was clear during the oral arguments and in the dissenting opinions. But that was only the beginning . . .
A co-plaintiff in our 2003 case, Citizens United, renewed the fight last year. They challenged campaign finance provisions that prohibited them from broadcasting a movie they had made about Hillary Clinton, who was then running for President. We asked DC Downsizers to help us provide funding for a brief in that case.
Our attorneys once again made their signature freedom of the press argument, and were the only ones to do so. We believe this argument had a big influence on the outcome.
On January 21 the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment freedom of speech guarantee prohibits the Government from enforcing any financial restrictions limiting core political speech involving elections based on a speaker’s corporate identity.
This is a huge victory for YOU. It’s a great step toward restoring YOUR ABILITY TO FIRE AND REPLACE YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES. But the media’s self-serving response has been predictable . . .
They have screamed that corporations have been given the right to buy elections, even though the media itself is entirely corporate, and already has the ability to spend unlimited amounts to influence elections. You can better understand the real truth by paying close attention to the full legal name of our two Downsize DC organizations . . .
The Downsize DC Foundation, Inc, and DownsizeDC.org, Inc.
Both Downsize DC organizations are corporations. The Supreme Court has just restored some of your ability to use us as a way to join with others in order to better exercise your freedoms of association, of speech, and of the press. To gain an even better understanding of this please watch the following 3-minute video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Ms. Sampson and her friends (depicted in the video) are nearly identical to the kind of association Downsize DC is, except that we’ve already bowed to legal requirements that we must incorporate in order to more fully exercise some of our supposed rights.
We will have much more to say about this in future Dispatches and blog posts . . .
* There are many more self-serving media lies that need to be corrected
* We need to develop a strategy and tools for dealing with the media in the same way that we deal with Congress
* We need to educate taxpayers about the true causes of government corruption, and why campaign contributions are a cure, and not a cause
* And we will need to continue to make our case to the Supreme Court in order overturn all of the incumbent protection laws, enhance your ability to fire members of Congress, and allow you to regain all of your rights of association, of speech, and of the press
If you’re happy about this victory and the role we played in it, and would like to see us do more, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to the Downsize DC Foundation, Inc.
Thank you for helping to make this victory possible.
Jim Babka
President
Downsize DC Foundation
& DownsizeDC.org, Inc.
P.S. The mainstream media sure had a lot to say about the Citizens United case, and much of it wasn’t true. We have some further analysis about this case at our blog, “Lying About the Citizens United Case.”
Mesa Nids Attack!
I just finished 800 points of the studio Tyranid army. They are dubbed the “Mesa Nids”. After seeing them together as a group against the mesa terrain it became apparent that was their habitat.
These are L3 and this is on the menu if you want your Tyranids painted this way.
As an alternate color scheme I recommend “Rust Nids” a Khaki carapace with colored talons and claws (ruddy orange or sombre grey).
Here’s what I have so far:
1x Trygon Prime
1x Harpy
3x Hive Guard
6x Raveners
Here’s what still has to be painting:
1x Doom of Malan’Tai
1x Mawloc
1x Tervigon
40x Termagants
10x Gargoyles
3x Zoanthropes
1x Swarmlord
2x Seed Pod conversions
Future plans:
1x Deathleaper
2-3x Venomthropes
20x Termagants
10x Gargoyles
1x Tervigon
10,000 Commandments
Both Republican and Democrat spending more than $3,000,000,000,000 annually.
“He [the king] has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”
— Declaration of Independence
Illinois! You’re UP!
Primaries in Illinois are up tomorrow, Tuesday February 2, 2010.
Shawn’s overall pick for the general election in November? Mike Labno. If you’re going to vote for him in the general election there’s no need to show up at the primary as he’s the only one on the Libertarian ticket.
Secondary picks–
Shawn’s pick for Republican candiate? Patrick Hughes.
Democratic Candidate? Ugh. If you must, Marshall looks good.
If anyone thinks they are throwing their vote away by voting for a non-two-party candidate; you are throwing your vote away anyway. Both of the main parties pursue basically the same disastrous course just in slightly different ways.
If the apathetics showed up en masse at the polls and just randomly selected any non-Democrat-non-Republican candidate it would uproot the entire system in one vomitous spasm that would eject the cancer that is the Congress.
Snorlax
This morning, with two little ones sick, and wife just completely burned out, I stayed home all day. Tamie slept in until around noon.
At first I thought I would take the two older kids with me to church, but then I realized that my poor wife would not get a moment’s rest with the little ones.
I went home teaching in the afternoon, two families. Our message based on an article Hold on a Little Longer which I think was better for me to hear than anyone. It was a moment of peace.
My wife made nachos for dinner (she makes deluxe mega-nachos) and we watched a few episodes of Arrested Development.
As I am playing Tyranids in the studio campaign, I’ve been reading over the Tyranids codex. It’s a wonderland of interesting stuff. I almost think you can’t go wrong.